Analysis of as new park case study Essay

Analysis of as newly greenness skid studyIntroduction The mean process enquires developers, communities, engineers, planners, and government. The involvement of each(prenominal) the stakeh ageders in planning process ensures that a project is positively implemented in the public interests (Carmona, 2010). The new project would commence as an improvement the old(a) city. The old city was widely used by women and children. Although it was developed 30 years ago, it save remained as the best choice for the mint dungeon at its vicinity. It formed the best recreation centre for wad during fervid winter season. The new honey oil would replace the old trees, grass, and build new shades and buildings that would be used to shade people during hot weather. The bailiwick involved closed d possess of the old city for 2 years and relocation of people living around the city to place where in that nonice were no social amenities such as schools and recreation centre. The hum an face represents of unethical issues that pertains to urban planning evident through the developers. The ethical issues accept closure of the city and denying people their recreational facility. The new cat valium organic evolution would deny people a chance to enjoy their recreational facilities, which is nonrecreationally unethical to a developer. In addition, the developer would be destroying peoples hereditary pattern on old trees and grass. The modern buildings would destroy the old trees and grass hereditary pattern in the new park. Moreover, it is non ethical to transfer people from their own comfort z integrity where they enjoyed social amenities such as schools, pose and some other infrastructures such other shopping malls to a place where they no longer enjoy the amenities. The act is believed to on self- interests that do not awe about other community. In planning process, it is important for planners and developers to consider professional ethical moti ve while executing their city planning so that prize between communities and the affected people is maintained (Allen, 2009). In this case, the most apparent solution would be first to develop the area where the two communities would be relocate ahead relocating them. It would be most appropriate if the government could suck up by developing infrastructures such as roads, schools, hospitals, and recreational centres before displacing people in towns if the new park would not be avoidable. On the other hand, a new park could be developed elsewhere and the old one be renovated to maintain national heritage. Moreover, the old park return should not be closed for a long period and should developers should forgo people to access the park even under constructions.The renovation of the park would ensure that the national heritage on traditional trees and grass would not be destroyed therefore maintain it as way of defend the countries autochthonal species. This would ensure that people are not relocated from their legitimate comfort zone. Consequently, development of area that the two communities were transferred would ensure that the communities living standards would not be affected except their geographical shift. The move would maintain the respect between the communities, planners, developers and engineers as their lives depart not be affected. The solution speak to where the planners would ensure that all the social amenities are developed before relocation would ensure that the professional code of ethics on the cognizant on the right of a third party would be upheld (American homework Association, 2009). In addition, the code of ethics on fairly dealing with all the people involved in the process leave behind be highly upheld. However, the value of professional code of ethics on heritage will be violated through electing a new park and indigenous trees will be destroyed. The planners will fork over made sure that the closing making process involves all the party and thus no one would be ostracizely affected by the new project. Similarly, the second draw near of electing the new park elsewhere would ensure professional code of ethics for planners to ensure social justice and responsibility not to disadvantage people would be upheld. This solution would ensure that people are not relocated and at the same time the national heritage is maintained. The value of heritage that is attributed to indigenous trees will be upheld while that of excellence form and updated traffic pattern will be violated (American Planning Association, 2009). Both solutions would minimize the negative impacts of the planning in the city. However, the best solution will be to design and construct the new park elsewhere near the old park. The solutions to planning dispute safeguard the rights of the people and the professional ethics of the planners (Staatskoerant, 2011).The old park can only be renovated so that the heritage of t he city will be upheld. Similarly, there would be relocation of people to new areas and thus they will be fairly treated and their lives will not be affected. In addition, the solution will ensure that people are not denied their rights to enjoy themselves during winter. Renovation for the old park could be done during spend when people are not using the park so that they would not be positioned access during winter. The move will impact positively to people living there and would retain the respect of communities to developers. The solution would limit the planners, developers and engineers from implementing their own design and planning of the city. In addition, the people would not have a chance to enjoy a modern facility. However, there would still be a chance for them to construct a new park elsewhere in the city and increase the number of parks. One that would be rich in heritage and there other one would be modern. Although space and area allocation may be a problem, a new park elsewhere would stand out for this case.Conclusion In conclusion, it can be noted that planners, developers and engineers should highly consider professional ethics when carrying out new projects that would impact negatively to the public. All planning processes should involve all stakeholders and fair implementation of the project should be considered to avoid unethical issues that are evidenced in the case of new park development.ReferencesAllen, J. (2009). resultant planning Ethics and etiquette a principled approach to the business of redundant event management. Mississauga, Ont Wiley.American Planning Association,. (2009). AICP decree of Ethics and Professional Conduct. Planning.org. Retrieved 13 May 2014, from http//www.planning.org/ethics/ethicscode.htmCarmona, M. (2010). Public places, urban spaces the dimension of urban design. Oxon Routledge.Staatskoerant,. (2011). Code of ethics and professional conduct for the urban and regional planning profession. Gov .za. Retrieved 13 May 2014, from http//www.gov.za/documents/download.php?f=147400Source document