Darkness at Noon Revision Notes Essay

Why does Nikolai Rubashov profess to crimes against the revolution that he has not committed? What atomic number 18 the political options open to Rubashov following his arrest? Which option does he postulate? Are the implications of the political com homophiled in Arthur Koesters Darkness at Noon anti-revolutionary or merely anti-Stalinist? Is Darkness at Noon an flack to explain why the Russian Revolution in particular failed or is it an attempt to explain why all revolutions that rely on carmine means to achieve their ends must fail? What is the central political demarcation of Arthur Koestlers Darkness at Noon? What are the political implications of his argument? Outline the most important differences in the political mentality of Rubashovs interrogators- Ivanov and Gletkin?What political options are open to Rubashov after he is arrested? Following Rubashovs arrest Ivanov gave the option of going through a public mental testing by confessing to certain acts, or having a p rivate administrative trial. humanity trial* This could lead to the depressing and weakening of the ideology * Rubashov held a high bearing within the party, and for him to be seen as a dissident would have steamy other revolutionaries * Would have made it more(prenominal) difficult for the party to discredit his views if Rubashov did not publically denounce himself * Doesnt servicing the revolution* hold his own honour in some ways but is of no use to the greater good Confess * Rubashov capitulates in order to serve the revolution and the party * Although he was not guilty of anything, he cannot prevail any reason in his own mind not to capitulate. Rubashov has been a creature of the party for his whole life, and now the party demands that he should confess * Justice and objective truth have ceased to have any message for him * He feels superior to his Czarist officer who inhabits the next cell, showing the differences in thought processes from a person ingrained with the party ideology versus the button-down angle who would uphold his honour* The officer believes that honour is about doing what you conjecture is right, an individualist perspective, where as Rubashov contends that to uphold the honour of the regime/revolution is more honourable. Ideology dictates the actions of all players in the regime citizen and state To serve the revolution, Rubashov finds it obligatory to capitulate serves the greater good it is better to confess to crimes not committed than to risk the reputation of the revolution for his own honour grammatical fiction there is no I. This is a demonstration of the corruption of revolutions enacted through untrained means. The means dont justify the ends when the citizens are being lose the revolution is supposed to act for the good of the people, but the ideology has wrench corrupted to serve the good of itself and its leader. Outline the most important differences in the political mentality of Rubashovs interrogato rs- Ivanov and Gletkin?Ivanov * He lived before the revolution, and was an intellectual who helped work on about and serve the revolution * He is not a man of violence would prefer to persuade Rubashov rather than beat him. Coercion is a last resort for him, but if it is necessary, he believes that the ends do justify the means.Gletkin * Gletkin is of the scrap generation of the revolution. He comes from a peasant background, is not an intellectual. Rubashov thinks of him as precise more than a violent thug. * His political views are therefore those of the party, he accepts what is force fed to him without thinking critically about it. * He is a man of violence. He wants to beat and torture Rubashov to obtain his confession. Therefore he doesnt believe in the idea of persuasion. However this does show that he believes the end justifies the means. * Gletkin is the culmination of what Koestler argues went wrong with the revolution he represents totalitarian thought, and he is the kind of individual that it produces. * born without an umbilical cord