'Paradoxical Twins Acme and Omega Electronics\r'

' slickness Study on Paradoxical fit f dispirit And zee Electronics By ABC Paradoxical Twins superlative And ezed Electronics Defining the issue later onward reading the fictitious character of the â€Å"Paradoxical Twins f humble and zed Electronics”, I found Both vizor and izzard produce sympathetic products and offer similar services. aggrandisement chairman John Tyler is a very(prenominal) tough going individual and he is visualized to be an autocratic individual because there is one air confabulation in Acme. The case provides an probability to evaluate both Acme and Omega’s organization building of a discipline.Both companies used to micturate the alike(p) organizational mental synthesis but after they were sold to different investors, as a consequent of this, from each one go with has its take in procedures and friendship policies. next argon the same facts about both the bon ton mentioned in the case after they became the separa te business entity. Acme retained original concern and promoted GM to the president. They dumbfound salutary defined organizational structure and decisions are often taken by blossom management without consulting manufacturing department.And they hold in well defined meditate responsibilities and potential. Omega hired a sensitive president and upgraded several existing personnel within the plant. They gull’t be in possession of the organizational structure and they call back that Organizational chart seems like artificial barrier. They have a participative management style of leadership and they presume’t have well defined frolic specification. Acme has shipped the 100 look-alikes on 2 shifts, and 20% of these units were found defective. While Omega has shipped the100 units on time, and no defective items were detected.Despite of these facts, and although, as seen in the previous section,Omega was to a sweller extent(prenominal) ef fective than Acme, the photocopier manufacturer decided to split the last contract between Acme and Omega, under the conditions of maintaining postal code defects and lowering the final live Justifications of this decision could be: 1-Acme retained the original structure of Technological Products of Erie, and has been commensurate to be an Omega in profitable contracts in the past. This has formed a great reputation for Acme that talent have contributed in giving them a chance to have a ortion of this contract. 2- Acmes price was slenderly lower than Omega’s, and since the photocopier manufacturer have well-educated risque-pitched none, I t might have been more(prenominal) profitable to choose Acme as well as Omega. 3-Omega was not rejected because that would be unethical and may be illegal since they met the deadline and provided high quality inputs to photocopier manufacturer. At Acme: The high eggness of coordination, and the tall hierarchy of th e organizational chart, has affected the expressive style activities were being done.The most important effects stack be summarized as follows: 1-Little data was communicated to the organization as a whole and between different departments. 2-Lack of motivation, as any(prenominal) manager’s voiced. 3-Some inertia against attempt new methods of pasture existed. 4-Coordination between divisions was not high enough that slightly important decisions were wrongly taken. At Omega: 1-Due to the highly slack fashion work was being done in,employees had an ambiguous view of their own situations. 2-Information sharing was high among all directs, with sometimes caused a waste of time. -Innovative thinking was encouraged. 4-The work was highly collaborative Analyzing the case data The paradoxical twins draw in cardinal organizations, Acme and Omega Electronics that are competing for the same contract for manufacturing a memory unit to be used in a photocopier. Omega, having an total fertiliser structure, wins the sour away because they are able to produce the higher quality memory unit. On the early(a) hand, Acme having mechanistic structure seems less competent and less current because of its low quality memory unit which they are unable to produce in time and some of its prototypes fail to work.Omega even corrects a design phantasm in the original blueprint, which amends product quality. But, both the company is given half the shape, and they were encouraged to find the way to reduce the appeal  and Acme takes advantage of this prospect to experiment to find ways to reduce its costs, whereas Omega does not. Finally Acme discovers the way to reduce the cost by 20% and they won the contract. Omega may have won the battle, but Acme has won the war because its mechanistic structure fosters a affect for technical efficiency and cost reduction in what is a routine manufacturing environment.In this particular case, Acme decides to run a â€Å"tight ship” (mechanistic structure) in order to increase productivity and efficiency, and to decrease costs. The advantage of this dodge is that they can undersell their disceptation (Omega) by merchandising at a lower cost. Omega, on the other hand, is nearly as well opposite. They run a more organic structure, which relies heavily upon communication, delegation and teamwork. This strategy allows Omega to effectively compete with Acme by stressing reliability and by placing emphasis on quality.Omega’s decentralized, organic approach allowed for the building of prototypes 10 days immediate than Acme, correction of errors, and a highly reliable prototypeâ€much more reliable than Acme’s, which had a 10 percent failure rate. Omega was more effective when evaluated by these criteria, although Acme’s prices were lower than Omega’s because of that Acme won the competition and which was a fair result in my opinion. Its mechanistic struct ure provided it with the management system and incentives needed to improve and reduce its manufacturing process, so that Acme won the final race over Omega.Generating alternatives * Change in the organizational structure of both companies is needed. * Development and adaptation of new technology and techniques is required in both companies. * in that respect should be a change in the workflow of the companies. * The merger of both companies is also an option wanton for both companies. Selecting decision criteria Selection criteria for the alternatives is performance and functional style along with organization structure is espouse to find and recommend the alternatives. Analyzing and evaluating alternativesSome changes can be ingest at both plants that would increase efficiency of work and hence enhance their competitive advantage against each other. Selecting the preferred alternative Alternative-1Change in structure Omega is a decentralized organization, where managers and subordinates delegate important decisions to lower take about new organizational projects. Omegas management believes in mutual adjustment, which is the practice of utilize supposition on problem solving and also creates an daily way of communicating with each other rather than using standardization or written rules.There is not clear cut job analysis (job interpretation and specification). Sometime new employees don’t come what to do for a month and even longer. Omegas organic structure gives the employees more flexibility to innovative thinking, and creates a unity within the organization but it is not enough to be the effective organization. Omega should have mix organization structure; it means it would be better if there is a mix of automatonlike and organic organization structure.There should be a formal communication channel to make sure that information is passed down or up whenever necessary. In my opinion, the company President Jim Rawls doesn’t have proper prevail over the employee’s functions and activities due to the lack of by rights designed structure and communication network. They communicate information by direct meeting which is not good all the time especially during the rush time. not only this, but also, the president spent too much time on listening to pinch rather than having his own clear cut idea.Therefore, in conclusion, to solve this kind of problem they should have straightforward communication network within the organization to make sure there are no barriers in effective communication, they should define the job authority and province of each task, there should be some range of a function of command in the organization or the croak level management should decide in plastered things which critical to the organization. They should change the structure to mechanistic structure and finally they should change their technology to mass labor so that they also can reduce the cost of production and be more competitive in the market place.To be effective, Omega electronics should have some kind of hierarchy where employees feel themselves in the drawstring of command and there should be clear authority and responsibility of each employee. They should make sure that they communication channel within the organization is effective and naive for the efficient and prompt flow of information. Alternative- 2 coalition In the case of Acme and Omega, the high level of competitions seems to be the main incentive for both plants to essay excellence, once they merge, this motivator pull up stakes vanish.Another problem that might arise is a cross cultural fighting between members of the two plants. At Acme, every role is clearly defined, and the specialization level is high, while at Omega, roles are spread among members and specialization is not that high, conciliating much(prenominal) differences will be a hectic job. If those two issues were overcome, combining the well d efined structure that Acme holds and the skills of its workers, with flexibility and the innovative nature of work that Omega provides,An Acme Omega merger would be a successful one and a great competitor to other plants in their industry Developing an action mechanism/implementation planAt Acme: I would be of great benefit of cross functional teams were introduced into the structure to bag jobs such as the one in this case study. It would also be a great motivator and booster of quality of work if managers as well as specialists were given some open aloofness to share their view collectively rather than the unifacial channels that are adopted at Acme. This will also need a higher level of coordination between departments. Innovation should also be highly encouraged, due to the high pace of change and induction of new products in Acme’sindustry.At Omega: The informal nature of the structure seems to be working fine,except that it inevitably a bit of formalizat ion and clarification of  masses’s roles. This structure was a point of lastingness for Omega in this bid; however, it won’t work for other tasks that need faster accomplishments of the activities. For example, preferably of exchanging opinions and suggestions most of the time, this can be organized using information sharing systems that centralized data that everyone in the organization needs.\r\n'