Kierkegaard And Nietzsche`s Ideas Of Existentialism

Kierkegaard , Nietzsche and ExistentialismAlthough their works and philosophical flavors predated the existential philosophy movement by to a greater extent years , Soren Kierkegaard and Friedrich Nietzsche are often considered founding fathers of existential philosopher philosophy This is non to say that separately philosopher s feels were identical . While they did share similarities , each(prenominal) had their give birth unique vista that was quite pronounced . For Kierkegaard , in that respect is an overwhelming notion present that pack ultimately cook themselves found on their reaction to truth . That is , people refer a certain tactual sensation system and then that belief system reacts to what is true . For framework , it is true that biography exists , precisely an atheist and a devoutly religious pe rson may have completely different outlooks on where living originates . As such , the centre of life derives from an internalization of what is outwardly discern . This may bring about the question What is true for sure enough absolute truth exists and there can not be two sides to truth . From this , we move on to NietzscheNietzsche possessed a much harder edged approach to truth because he sought-after(a) to go directly to the root of what is true and hack outside at unessential material that obstructed truth . For example , in Nietzsche s criticism or art he considers the lesson lessons a playwright may attempt to teach as inherently affectation because the world of the story composed to put by the notion of unblemished truths was created exclusively by the playwright (artist ) so as to create a world that perceived moral lesson . In new(prenominal) words , the theme is not only if true because it derives from a purely manufactured world designed to sell th e truthVery fewer philosophical movements a! re as misconceive as existentialism . For many , existentialism s outlook that peerless must conform to life on its own merits appertains purely to looking at the negative nature of life . In short , existentialism is little more than glorified cynicism .

This wrong definition is based on a number of false premises not the least of which is assuming facts not in evidence In other words , seeing life based on its own merits refers that there is emphasis on a want of hope and a lack of peremptory beliefs . Again , this is nonsensical because if an existentialist believes that people are inherently good and th at worthiness is the central tenant of human beings then seeing life on its own merits may refer to a belief that all human action is inherently good . This is farther from a distrustful outlook granted , many existentialist philosophers did not have such a bright eyed outlook on the world and the people who inhabited it , save this was not because they were cynical , but because they were realists who looked at life resembling it actually was and in looking at life as it was they understood that humans created who they were in call of creating their identity , their outlook on the word and , to a undischarged extent , their own self worth and meaning . This meaning could be cynical , it could be gullible or it...If you wish to get a full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper