Sunday, April 7, 2019

Cognitive and Emotional Intelligence paper sample Essay Example for Free

cognitive and aroused Intelligence paper sample try onDECLARATIONI decl ar that this assessment is my own realize, based on my own mortalal investigate/study . I also decl atomic number 18 that this assessment, nor give ways of it, has non been previously submitted for every other unit of measurement/module or course, and that I fix not copied in part or whole or otherwise plagiarised the work of another student and/or persons. I dumbfound read the ACAP savant Plagiarism and Academic Misconduct Policy and lowstand its implications. I also declare, if this is a practical skills assessment, that a Client/Inter faceee Consent Form has been read and signed by both parties, and where applicable parental take on has been obtained. Organisational BehaviourAssessment 1Two important differences in makeupal behaviour are cognitive apprehension and aroused perception. The following essay evaluates theoretical and practical strengths and limitations of both intelligences an d discusses the application of each in sophisticated organisations. Modern organisations face differing challenges to those of the previous century, luxuriously turn-over, globalization and the rapid development of ever changing engineering science all require special attention. It has never been more(prenominal) important to find the line of products person for the right personal credit line. full general psychic ability does not give the whole picture. There is a link surrounded by cognitive and emotional intelligence, each be important contributors to red-brick organisations.Cognitive intelligence (CI) has traditionally been the index of prospered job performance (Bosco, Nathan, Allen, 2012). Organisational psychology uses cognitive ability to predict workplace success (Neisser etal., 1996). Cognitive intelligence git be normally defined as academic ability, IQ or general mental ability, including the ability to critically think and rationalness logically, to ana lyse and problem solve, as well as individualistic aptitude in reading and writing (Sternberg, 2006). CI is a valuable asset in employees, particularly in rough specialist fields where critical thinking, logic and reason are required, occupations such(prenominal) as scientific exploreers, accountants, economists etc. The capacity of all workers to engage cognitive intelligence in affectionate and effective decision making serves as an important basis for achieving successful outcomes in the most workplaces. Patton (2003) constitute a consequence of the developing business climate is the global economy and the Internet, each necessitating an increased step on it of confabulations in business transactions. Decisive leaders are forced to make timely decisions without claver and all the data on hand, such an environment necessitates in the need for gameyer levels of general mental ability in order to achieve both increased levels and faster acquisition of job knowledge, so le ading to greater levels of job performance (Schmidt Hunter, 2004). CEO of SouthwestOrganisational BehaviourAssessment 1Airlines, crowd Patton, displayed the importance of quick and effective decision making when facing a crisis on September 11, 2001. When planes where grounded and millions of take inengers stranded, Patton unyielding that customers and staff would come first. No employees were required to stand down or take pay cuts, and passengers were disposed hassle free refunds, furthermore, Southwest employees were encouraged to take passengers to a movie or bowling to pass the time while awaiting news. In the aftermath of 9/11, while most airlines were reducing their workforces by 20% Southwest announced a $179.8 million profit sharing program for employees and managed to retain all staff (Gittell et el, 2006). Other pillow slips of CI are literacy skills, such as reading and writing which are major tools of red-brick daybusinesses emails, documents and various other i tem of paperwork require high levels of accuracy for effective communication, efficiency on computers and an ability to learn new technology is important in this information world. McKenney, Copeland, Copeland and Mason (1995) propose that the variety in communications and information technology should be considered as a dominant force in recent kindly and economic change. Although CI is undeniably important in establishing an efficient workforce it is not the whole picture.The value of cognitive intelligence is irrefutable however some limitations apply. Validities of predicting outcomes in real conduct are low. jibe to Viswevaran and Ones (2002), general mental ability accounts for only 25% variance in work performance. Furthermore, they suggest that intelligent behaviour is more than just the firmness of purpose of what intelligence tests measure. A practical example of the limitations of cognitive intelligence can be referred back to the other airlines effected by the 9/11 crisis. While Southwest airlines triumphed against adversary other airlines suffered greatly. There is no denying that the CEOs of these struggling airlines were batch of high cognitive intelligence, however, this personal asset alone was not enough to avoid financial losses, whitethornhap other ingredients suchas emotional intelligence and adequate policies are still required in order to retain consumer trust. Other CI limitations include measurement, particularly IQ testing which may result in adverse impact against minorities (Viswesvaran Ones, 2002).Tests presented in a language other than an individuals immemorial language as well as differing cultural approaches make the result of such tests weighted in favour of the culture that produced it. High IQ does not guarantee adequate function in theworkplace. passing gifted people are often underestimated and misunderstood by peers and society (Nauta Corten, 2002). They may make unable leaders as staff may not appreciate their intensity, perfectionism, questioning, and being too smart Heylighten (n.d.). Furthermore, CI does not guarantee a good team player. Elkin and Burke (2008) report Steve Jobs, while an example of a successful individual with extremely high cognitive intelligence, is reputed to have been a tyrant to work for. Critics title of respect he took credit for ideas that were not his, was not a team player, and was impatient, domineering and obsessive, behaviour which is inducing of high staff perturbation or low employee retention rates.They also suggest Jobs strengths such as vision, magnetized charisma, perfectionism, all drove him to be a great CEO but are also the kindred drives that placed his company, staff and investors at risk. Highly intelligent individuals may have issues with delegation, trust, admitting error or asking for help. When compared to autonomous work, good teamwork enables tasks to be accomplished faster and more efficiently, reduces workloads, work pressure and improves staff traffic (Kelly, 2004). Some highly intelligent people, such as those with Aspergers Syndrome, may have low social skills. Individuals with Aspergers may test very highly on a CI tests but often their communication with others is blunt, awkward, stilted or odd (Shea, 2009). Saaty (1999) suggests that primary language expresses affections rather than ideas or thoughts. An inability to effectively spread abroad with consumers may result in difficult social relationships. While CI is indeed an important musing in employee ability it is not a stand-alone measure of success.Emotional Intelligence (EI) is increasingly being viewed as having a significant influence on job performance and effective leadership in the workforce. A commonly referred to definition of EI was given by Mayer, Caruso and Salovey (1999) Emotional intelligence refers to an ability torecognise the meanings of emotions and their relationships and to reason and problem solve on the basis of them. Emotio nal intelligence is involved in the capacity to grok emotions, assimilate emotion-related feelings, understand the information of those emotions and manage them (p. 267). EI reflects ones capacity to cope with daily challenges and may assist in predicting both personal and professional success in life. Assets in any running(a) relationship include social awareness, social networking, relationship counselling, self-awareness and self-management. While small business has long relied on judgment the importance of social networking and keeping healthy relationships and positive reputation in their community, new technology, globalization and social media now take social awareness and social networking to a whole new level.According to Qualman (2009) global connectivity now results in both positive and negative messages regarding products and services becoming immediately, permanently and good accessible to the whole world. EI is a valuable asset in employees, particularly in some s pecialist fields where charisma and empathy are required, such as, sales and marketing, counselling or nursing. Effective leaders, as part of their role in managing relationships, should embody competent levels of respect, empathy, courtesy, motivation and be able to inspire others. The importance of empathy can be illustrated by an American business called Toro who manufacture commercial lawn equipment. The nature of the product results in close to 100 serious injuries annually, prior to the appointment of CEO Ken Melrose, Toro faced an average of 50 law suits per year, resulting in massive financial losses to the company. However, Melrose added empathy. Injured workers and their families where meet by company representatives, sympathies where expressed, investigations made and any needs were meet at the onset.This change in policy has reduced the number of lawsuits from anaverage of 50 per year to only one since 1991 when the policy was introduced (Rainey, Chan Begin, 2008). Fu rthermore, leaders need teams who are energetic, innovative, creative and passionate (Sloane, 2007). taste individual drives and motivations enables management to get the best results from their team. Effective management must be self-aware and have the ability to self-manage, including being aware of and managing moods, adapt appropriate emotions and behaviours to appropriate situations. Jack Welsh, Chairman of General electric car states that A leaders intelligence must have a strong emotional component. He has to have high levels of self-awareness, maturity and self-control. (as cited in Balakrishanan Mouli, 2011, p. 44). EI allows managers to get the best out of their employees. Perks (2007) advises that successful leaders are high in emotional intelligence they maintain positive working relationships and employ adequate coping strategies in all areas of life. Leaders, ideally, should possess emotional intelligence to encourage the best of their team.Emotional intelligence, h owever, has its limitations. Cherniss (2010) even suggests that EI has produced the highest level of contestation in the social sciences of recent years. More clarity in regard to theory is required. Roberts, Matthews and Zeinder (2010) propose that EI models do not adequately address theory. Furthermore, Roberts suggests that emotional intelligence definitions lack clarity and questions the criterion of which qualities should belong under the banner of emotional intelligence. It seems necessary to adopt one clear common definition. Measures of EI are currently develop in this relatively new field, more research and the creation of better measures may improve innovation validity (Cherniss, 2010). This may result in the development of greater understanding and respect for the field. There is no guarantee that a person high in EI, will use this asset in a positive manner. Individuals with high emotional intelligence may manipulate people or situations for personal gain. Saaty (2001 ) suggests that decisions are not always based on the greatest ideabut on a persons ability to persuade others to accept the idea. More exploration and clarification is required to address some of the limitations of emotional intelligence.Modern organisations face fundamentally different problems from those of the in the past, globalization, increases in technology and staff turnover are just some of the issues being confronted. The belief has been held for around a century that higher(prenominal) intelligence in individuals is more treasured due to their higher task performance (Viswesvaran Ones, 2002). Modern organisations provide services, and are organised according to a blend of individuals, information and communication technology, social capital and accept talents (Schoemaker Jonkers, 2005). The measuring of CI enables modern organisations an affordable and speedy way of evaluating an employees general mental ability. General mental ability has been related to occupationa l level on both cross-sectional and longitudinal studies (Schmidt Hunter, 2004). CI measures allow employers to apply specific cognitive abilities to valid and appropriate positions within the business with a view to discovering the best person for the job. According to Holloway (2003) employing the right person for the job or job fit is more essential now than ever.Job fit can be described as the degree to which a persons cognitive abilities, interests and personality dynamics fit those required for the job (Russell, 2003, p.27). This is where the importance of emotional intelligences comes into play. A constant balance between understanding the individual drives and motivations of workers and ensuring staff remain engaged, enthusiastic and valued has legion(predicate) rewards for modern organisations. Incorporating a balance between both intelligences gives employees the greatest chance of achieving appropriate job fit. Holloway (2003) states that positive job fit, results in in creased job satisfaction, increased productivity and reduced staff turnover. Furthermore, research by OReilly, Chatman and Caldwell (1991) suggests newly hired staff whose with values that fit in with the culture of the organisation tend to adjust quicker, remain longer with the company and are overall more satisfied. While Hollaway,(2003) states that understanding of workers in regards to work/life balance, personal goals and drives may encourage loyalty reducing turnover, saving on retraining and downtime. Furthermore, EI combined with CI addresses the gaps between management and workers through understanding of positive leading by example management that can result in emulation by employees resulting in a flow effect throughout the organisation. There is a strong link between emotional intelligence and cognitive intelligence and the gang of both intelligences has become necessary for successful business relations in modern organisations.Cognitive intelligence and emotional inte lligence are each important factors in regard to individual differences in the field of organisational behaviour in modern organisations. While general mental ability accounts for many valuable employee assets such as efficiencies in regard to knowledge acquisition and technological aptitude, limitations to validity and measurement of testing and relevance mean that cognitive intelligence is not the only measure of a successful employee. Emotional intelligence also plays a key role in individual success in modern organisations. Effective leadership, self- awareness, social networking, empathy, self-management are all are assets of the emotionally intelligent. Modern organisations benefit from the combination of both intelligences by finding the best fit for the position resulting in higher job satisfaction, higher retention of staff and greater profits.ReferencesBalakrishanan, L., Mouli, S. (2011). Emotional Intelligence A Key for Effective Employee Management. Amet daybook of Ma nagement,1(1),44. Retrieved from http//www.ametjournal.com/ addition/Amet-journal.pdfBosco, F. A., Nathan, B., Allen, D. G. (2012, July). Higher validity and less adverse impact Using Executive Attention to measure cognitive ability. Paper presented at the meeting of the International Personnel Assessment Council, Las Vegas, NV. Cherniss, C. (2010). Emotional intelligence Toward clarification of a concept. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 3(2), 110-126. doi10.1111/j.1754-9434.2010.01231.x Elkind, P., Burke, D. (2008). The trouble with Steve. Fortune, 157, 54-63. Retrieved from http//personal.bellevuecollege.edu/llum/GBUS101/09WSteveJobs.pdf Gittell, J. H., Cameron, K., Lim, S., Rivas, V. (2006). Relationships, layoffs, and organizational resilience airline industry responses to September 11. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 42(3), 300-329. doi10.1177/0021886306286466Heylighen, F. (n.d.). Gifted People and their Problems. Retrieved from http//pespmc1.vub.ac.be/P apers/GiftedProblems.pdfHiggins, D. M., Peterson, J. B., Pihl, R. O., Lee, A. G. (2007). Prefrontal cognitive ability, intelligence, Big fiver personality, and the prediction of advanced academic and workplace performance. Journal of personality and social psychology, 93(2), 298. doi10.1037/00223514.93.2.298 Holloway, P. (2003). Job physical fitness Series The Right Person for the Job. AboutPeople. Retrieved from http//www.aboutpeople.com/PDFFiles/The%20Right%20Person%20For%20the%20Job.pdfKelly, B., (2014). Importance of aggroupwork in Organizations, Demand Media retrieved March 8, 2014. Retrieved from http//everydaylife.globalpost.com/importance-teamworkorganizations-12033.html McKenney, J. L., Copeland, D. C., Copeland, D. G., Mason, R. O. (1995).Waves of change Business growth through information technology. Harvard Business Press. Boston, USA. doi 10.1080/08109029608632025Mayer, J. D., Caruso, D. R., Salovey, P. (1999). Emotional intelligence meets traditional standards f or an intelligence. Intelligence, 27(4), 267-298. doi10.1016/s0160-2896(99)00016-1 Mayer, J. D., Roberts, R. D., Barsade, S. G. (2008). Human abilities Emotional intelligence. Annual Review Psychology, 59(1), 507-536.doi10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093646Nauta, N. Corten, F. (2002) Tijdschrift voor Bedrijfs- en Verzekeringsgeneeskunde Journal for occupational and Insurance Physicians, 10(11), 332-335. doi10.1007/12498.1876-5858 Neisser, U., Boodoo, G., Bouchard Jr, T. J., Boykin, A. W., Brody, N., Ceci, S. J., Urbina, S. (1996). Intelligence Knowns and unknowns. American psychologist, 51(2), 77. doi10.1037/0003-066x.51.2.77OReilly, C. A., Chatman, J., Caldwell, D. F. (1991). People and organizational culture A profile comparison approach to assessing person-organization fit. Academy of management journal, 34(3), 487-516. doi 10.2307/256404Patton, J. R. (2003). Intuition in decisions. Management Decision, 41(10), 989-996. doi10.1108/00251740310509517Perks, J. (2007, September ). The subprogram of Emotional Intelligence in Business. computing device Weekly.com retrieved from http//www.computerweekly.com/news/2240082956/The-role-of-emotionalintelligence-in-business Qualman, E. (2009). Socialnomics How Social Media Transforms the Way we Live and do Business. Hoboken, USA. John Wiley Sons. doi10.5860/CHOICE.48-1576Rainey, M. B., Chan, K., Begin, J. (2008). Characterized by conciliation Heres how business can use apology to diffuse litigation. Alternatives to the High Cost of Litigation, 26(7), 131-134. doi 10.1002/alt.20237Roberts, R. D., Matthews, G., Zeinder, M. (2010). Emotional Intelligence Muddling with Theory and Measurement. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 3, 140-144. doi 10.1111/j.1754-9434.2010.01214.xRussell, C. (2003). Right Person, Right Job Guess or KnowThe breakthrough Technologies of Performance Information, (2nd ed.). Amherst, USA. HRD Press Inc. Saaty, T. L. (2001). Decision Making for Leaders the Analytic Hierarchy Process for Decisions in a Complex World (2nd ed.). Pittsburgh, USA. RWS publications. doi 10.1080/00137918308967693Schmidt, F. L., Hunter, J. (2004). General Mental Ability in the World of Work Occupational Attainment and Job Performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86(1), 162173. doi 10.1037/0022-3514.86.1.162 Schoemaker, M., Jonker, J. (2005). Managing Intangible Assets An Essay on Organising present-day(a) Organisations Based upon Identity, Competencies and Networks. Journal of Management Development, 24(6), 506-518. doi 10.1108/02621710510600964Shea, S.(2009). Capstone Communications Difficulties Among Individuals With and Without Aspergers Syndrome. Retrieved fromhttp//www.asdjobsink.com/CommunicationDifficulties.pdfSloane, P. (2007). The Innovative Leader How to Inspire Your Team and Drive Creativity. Philadelphia, USA. Kogan Page Publishers. Retrieved fromhttp//books.google.com.au/books?id=fb1vXOzjIBYCprintsec=frontcoversource=gbs_ge _summary_rcad=0v=onepageqf=f alseSternberg, R. J. 2006. Intelligence. Encyclopedia of Cognitive Science. doi 10.1002/0470018860.s00555Viswesvaran, C. Ones, D. S. (2002). Agreements and Disagreements on the Role of General Mental Ability (GMA) in Industrial, Work, and Organizational Psychology. Human Performance, 15(1/2), 211-231. doi10.1207/s15327043hup150102_13

No comments:

Post a Comment